America’s Seen 50% Surge In Partisan Conflict Since Obama’s Second Term Started

Posted: June 24, 2016 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,

‘Hope & Change’ and devolved into Nope & Deranged… Since the start of President Obama’s second term, Goldman Sachs note that the Partisan Conflict Index has averaged 50% higher than its 30 year average. So who is to blame? President Obama’s divisiveness? Or The Federal Reserve’s extremely accommodative monetary polict removing any need for actual decision-making?

Get back to work Mr. Chair(wo)man!!

As we previoously noted, while President Obama’s progressive agenda has not endeered a “reaching across the aisle” moment, we place the blame squarely at the foot of The Federal Reserve and one look at the chart below shows the surge in “conflict” since The Fed started printing money, slashing rates, and enabling largesse…

We have said for many years that accommodative monetary policy completely removes the burden from politicians that would require them to actually make difficult decisions around fiscal reforms, and now Standard & Poor’s is saying the same thing.

Speaking in London on Tuesday, S&P’s top EMEA analyst Moritz Kraemer said that there was a strong relationship between government bond yields, an indicator of how much countries must pay to borrow, and their willingness to undertake structural reforms. “All of these (reform) efforts from the governments have really fallen by the wayside under the palliative that the ECB is providing” Kramer told the Euromoney Global Borrowers & Bond Investors Forum.

As the ECB policymakers have been urging governments to take advantage of the easy financing conditions to implement reforms, Kramer points out what everyone other than central planners have already figured out, which is that as long as the central banks monetize the debt, why face political difficulties and enact reforms – “The moment the pressure goes away, the action goes away as well” Kramer said.

Kramer also pointed out that in a normal interest rate environment, government deficits across the bloc would be 1.5 to 2 percentage points of GDP higher, which would force the issue of reform up the agenda for many nations.

Simply put, as we have tried to convey repeatedly over the years. As long as the central banks will continue to monetize the government’s debt, and continue to push trillions of sovereign debt into negative yields, no pressure will ever be felt by any government to change its ways.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s